ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Comparative Analysis of 3 Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Minimal Predictors of Patellofemoral Instability Risk Factors.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship of Baseline Physical Activity and Morphologic Factors in Patients With Lateral Patellar Instability.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- MRI-based morphometric analysis of the patellofemoral joint: diagnostic modeling of knee pathologies in adolescents.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments are considered important for predicting patellar dislocation. Risk factors for patellar dislocation have not yet been clearly identified. Purpose: To identify patellofemoral instability anatomic risk factors using MRI and enhance the area under the curve (AUC) through optimized machine learning (ML) methods. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An age- and sex-matched control group of 121 patients was selected. The assessed patellofemoral morphological parameters included trochlear depth, sulcus angle, trochlear facet asymmetry, lateral trochlear inclination, Wiberg index, lateral patellar facet angle, Wiberg angle, patellar tilt, and trochlear medialization. Differences between groups were analyzed based on the MRI parameters. In addition, ML models were created and optimized using these measured parameters to investigate their diagnostic potential. Logistic regression analysis (LRA), support vector machine (SVM), and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) were employed as machine learning techniques. Results: Sex differences were found in trochlear depth, trochlear groove medialization, lateral patellar facet angle, and Wiberg angle, whereas no sex differences were observed in the other measured parameters. Significant differences between the control and dislocation groups were found for all patellofemoral morphological parameters, except for trochlear facet asymmetry. A significant difference was observed in the patellar height parameter between the 2 groups. Among the measured patellofemoral parameters, patellar tilt showed the highest AUC (0.8). Of the optimized ML models, the LGBM demonstrated the highest AUC at 0.873. When the number of variables used in the SVM model, which employed the fewest variables, was applied to both LGBM and LRA, the SVM model achieved the highest AUC at 0.858. Conclusion: Patellar tilt and trochlear depth exhibited the strongest correlation with patellar dislocation. The optimized ML techniques showed improved AUC values compared with those of existing models. However, while a higher AUC can be achieved by using more variables, this approach has proven to be inefficient. Therefore, for practical clinical applications, it is important to focus on using the minimum number of variables in optimized ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.