ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Nearly half of 325 athletes reported pelvic floor symptoms: a cross-sectional study at the Lima 2024 World Athletics U20 Championships.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pelvic floor symptoms in 746 female field hockey players in Australia. A retrospective survey.JSAMS plus · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, aetiology, care and prevention strategies for pelvic floor disorders in young nulliparous female athletes in athletics: a scoping review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing women's health: pelvic floor considerations in sports and physical activity.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Pelvic floor, hormones, and performance: trying to fill in the gap.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of an innovative educational program on female athletes' knowledge and habits related to pelvic floor care: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) symptoms are common among athletes but remain underexplored in youth of both sexes competing in track and field. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of PFD. Secondary objectives evaluated symptoms impact, awareness of pelvic floor health, related behaviours and gynaecological health in females. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted during the Lima 2024 World Athletics U20 Championships. All athletes were eligible and invited to complete a multilingual, anonymous web-based survey assessing pelvic floor health. Results: Of the 325 athletes who participated (59.1% females, 40.9% males), 43.7% (n=142) reported PFD symptoms. Prevalence was similar across daily life and athletics activities. Overactive bladder and pelvic pain were the most common conditions. Females had higher PFD rates (n=103, 53.7%) compared with males (n=39, 29.3%). Athletes with athletics-related urinary incontinence (n=42; 12.9%) reported frustration and reduced concentration during performance. Symptomatic athletes had low body mass index and reported more maladaptive pelvic floor-related behaviours than asymptomatic athletes (p<0.05). Menstrual issues and contraceptive use were more frequent among females with PFD (p<0.05). Fewer than 30% (n=95) were aware of pelvic floor health, and 88% (n=286) had never undergone screening. Most did not disclose symptoms (n=111; 78.2%) or seek specialised care (n=135; 95.1%). Conclusions: PFD was prevalent among elite youth athletes, particularly females. These findings highlight the need for proactive strategies, including education, embedding pelvic floor health in medical evaluations and addressing sex-specific needs to optimise athletes' health throughout their careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.