ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Digital monitoring and electronic patient-reported outcomes collection following atrial fibrillation ablation.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Clinical Pathways in Atrial Fibrillation: A Framework Aligned with the AF-CARE Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A New Paradigm for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Obesity Focusing on Substrate Remodeling and Patient-Centered Outcomes.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Lifestyle modification in atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms, phenotypes and ablation outcomes.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- PROMBot-HSM-AF: protocol for a feasibility study of a chatbot-based platform to collect patient-reported outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A bidirectional relationship between atrial fibrillation and depression: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical implications.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Clinical and procedural outcomes of very high-power short-duration vs. standard power ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Continuous smartwatch monitoring after atrial fibrillation ablation: feasibility of burden estimation and association with quality of life.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenging condition to manage traditionally in clinical practice, and despite improvements in digital health, its impact on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a structured digital-blended follow-up for patients undergoing AF ablation, incorporating electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) while evaluating its impact on the timing of recurrence diagnosis and reintervention. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients enrolled in a structured 2-year digital program starting in January 2021. This featured a Web platform for physicians to record clinical variables and a patient-centered mobile application to report PROM (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life [AFEQT] and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]). Clinical outcomes were compared with those from a retrospective conventionally managed cohort (2017-2020) after propensity score matching (n = 363 per group). Results: Until May 2024, 421 patients were enrolled (mean age: 60.9 years; 33.0% female). Over a median follow-up of 546 days, 64% of the patients used the application monthly, and completeness rates for AFEQT and PROMIS questionnaires were 80% and 50%, respectively. At 12 months, significant improvements were observed for AFEQT and PROMIS scores (cognitive and physical function, anxiety, and depression). Arrhythmia recurrence significantly influenced the rates of changes for AFEQT, depression, and physical function ( Conclusion: Systematic electronic PROM collection after AF ablation is feasible in clinical practice. Structured digital-blended integrated care guarantees continuity of AF management and supports earlier detection and treatment of recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.