Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734743›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Digital monitoring and electronic patient-reported outcomes collection following atrial fibrillation ablation.

João G Almeida, Rafael Teixeira, Inês Neves, Mafalda Carrington, Paulo Fonseca, Marco Oliveira, Helena Gonçalves, João Primo, Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho, Sérgio Barra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

João G AlmeidaCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Rafael TeixeiraCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Inês NevesCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Mafalda CarringtonCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Paulo FonsecaCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Marco OliveiraCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Helena GonçalvesCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
João PrimoCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Ricardo Fontes-CarvalhoCardiology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Sérgio BarraLuz Arrábida Hospital, Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal.
Juan Pablo MartínezAragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), IIS-Aragon, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Rute AlmeidaCINTESIS@RISE, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenging condition to manage traditionally in clinical practice, and despite improvements in digital health, its impact on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a structured digital-blended follow-up for patients undergoing AF ablation, incorporating electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) while evaluating its impact on the timing of recurrence diagnosis and reintervention. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients enrolled in a structured 2-year digital program starting in January 2021. This featured a Web platform for physicians to record clinical variables and a patient-centered mobile application to report PROM (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life [AFEQT] and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]). Clinical outcomes were compared with those from a retrospective conventionally managed cohort (2017-2020) after propensity score matching (n = 363 per group). Results: Until May 2024, 421 patients were enrolled (mean age: 60.9 years; 33.0% female). Over a median follow-up of 546 days, 64% of the patients used the application monthly, and completeness rates for AFEQT and PROMIS questionnaires were 80% and 50%, respectively. At 12 months, significant improvements were observed for AFEQT and PROMIS scores (cognitive and physical function, anxiety, and depression). Arrhythmia recurrence significantly influenced the rates of changes for AFEQT, depression, and physical function ( Conclusion: Systematic electronic PROM collection after AF ablation is feasible in clinical practice. Structured digital-blended integrated care guarantees continuity of AF management and supports earlier detection and treatment of recurrences.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationDigital healthMobile healthPatient-reported outcomesQuality-of-life

Identifiers

PMID40734743
PMCPMC12302198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.