ArticleJPRAS open2025
Rethinking treatment strategies for second-degree palmar burns in adults: A ten-year retrospective outcome analysis at a major burn center.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hand burns are common, affecting 80 % of burn cases and 40 % of hospitalized patients. Although the palmar surface constitutes only 1.2 % of total body surface area, burns in this region can severely impair hand function. Currently, no standardized treatment guidelines exist. This study analyzes functional and aesthetic outcomes in adult patients with conservatively treated partial-thickness palmar burns. Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted on adult patients with second-degree palmar burns treated between 2012 and 2022. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated based on skin discoloration, scarring, and patient-reported concerns. Results: Of 316 cases, 57 (18.0 %) met inclusion criteria. Deep burns were more often treated inpatient (60.0 % vs. 24.4 %, Conclusions: Deep burns showed significantly longer healing times but no major differences in functional or aesthetic outcomes compared to superficial burns. Non-isolated burns were associated with poorer functional outcomes and longer recovery, suggesting that burn extent impacts healing and rehabilitation needs. These findings support structured follow-up and rehabilitation strategies, emphasizing the need for further research to refine treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.