ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Machine Learning-Based Model Selection and Averaging Outperform Single-Model Approaches for a Priori Vancomycin Precision Dosing.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07695571 (Hybrid Population Pharmacokinetic,Machine Learning and Deep Learning Modelling to Predict Dosing for the Individualization of Cyclosporine Therapy in Transplant Recipients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hybrid Population Pharmacokinetic,Machine Learning and Deep Learning Modelling to Predict Dosing for the Individualization of Cyclosporine Therapy in Transplant Recipients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model Ensembling and Machine Learning Approaches to Predict the First Dose of Amoxicillin in Intensive Care.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Vancomycin target attainment improved following population pharmacokinetic model switch: a large-scale quasi-experimental study of precision dosing.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Generating and Modeling Virtual Patient Data from Published Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses: A Vancomycin Case Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Data to Dose: Diversity in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacokinetics-Based Individualization of Drug Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selecting an appropriate population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for individual patients in model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can be challenging, particularly in the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples. We developed a machine learning (ML) model to guide individualized PK model selection for a priori MIPD of vancomycin based on routinely recorded patient characteristics. This retrospective analysis included 343,636 vancomycin TDM records, each from a distinct adult patient across 156 healthcare centers, along with a priori predictions from six PK models. A multi-label classification approach was applied, labeling PK model predictions based on whether they fell within 80%-125% of observed TDM values. Various modeling strategies were evaluated using XGBoost as the base algorithm, with binary relevance selected for the final model. At the prediction stage, PK models were ranked and averaged for each patient based on ML-predicted probabilities that predictions would fall within 80%-125% of the observed concentration. Selecting the highest ranked PK model for each patient and ML-based model averaging outperformed all single PK models, body mass index-based selection, and naive averaging. On a population level, these ML approaches resulted in more accurate predictions, a higher proportion of predictions within 80%-125% of observed vancomycin concentrations, and no systematic bias. Predictive performance declined with lower ML-assigned rankings, and selecting the lowest-ranked PK model for each patient resulted in worse performance than the worst-performing single PK model. By guiding the selection of appropriate models and avoiding less suitable ones, ML approaches for a priori MIPD may improve early dosing decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.