Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734640›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

Machine Learning-Based Model Selection and Averaging Outperform Single-Model Approaches for a Priori Vancomycin Precision Dosing.

Wisse van Os, Amaury O'Jeanson, Carla Troisi, Chun Liu, Jordan T Brooks, Jasmine H Hughes, Dominic M H Tong, Ron J Keizer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07695571 (Hybrid Population Pharmacokinetic,Machine Learning and Deep Learning Modelling to Predict Dosing for the Individualization of Cyclosporine Therapy in Transplant Recipients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07695571 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Hybrid Population Pharmacokinetic,Machine Learning and Deep Learning Modelling to Predict Dosing for the Individualization of Cyclosporine Therapy in Transplant Recipients

TypeobservationalSponsorYasmin medhat munir MohamedRan2026 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsBone Marrow Transplantation, AML
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wisse van OsDivision of Systems Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-4173
Amaury O'JeansonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0007-6217-4283
Carla TroisiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-5617-0331
Chun LiuDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-6113-9427
Jordan T BrooksInsightRX, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-9714
Jasmine H HughesInsightRX, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3053-1251
Dominic M H TongInsightRX, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7396-7958
Ron J KeizerInsightRX, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-7056

Funding

European Union's H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Research and Innovation Program 861323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for individual patients in model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can be challenging, particularly in the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples. We developed a machine learning (ML) model to guide individualized PK model selection for a priori MIPD of vancomycin based on routinely recorded patient characteristics. This retrospective analysis included 343,636 vancomycin TDM records, each from a distinct adult patient across 156 healthcare centers, along with a priori predictions from six PK models. A multi-label classification approach was applied, labeling PK model predictions based on whether they fell within 80%-125% of observed TDM values. Various modeling strategies were evaluated using XGBoost as the base algorithm, with binary relevance selected for the final model. At the prediction stage, PK models were ranked and averaged for each patient based on ML-predicted probabilities that predictions would fall within 80%-125% of the observed concentration. Selecting the highest ranked PK model for each patient and ML-based model averaging outperformed all single PK models, body mass index-based selection, and naive averaging. On a population level, these ML approaches resulted in more accurate predictions, a higher proportion of predictions within 80%-125% of observed vancomycin concentrations, and no systematic bias. Predictive performance declined with lower ML-assigned rankings, and selecting the lowest-ranked PK model for each patient resulted in worse performance than the worst-performing single PK model. By guiding the selection of appropriate models and avoiding less suitable ones, ML approaches for a priori MIPD may improve early dosing decisions.

Indexed as

Drug Dosage CalculationsMachine LearningModels, BiologicalVancomycinAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinmachine learningmodel‐informed precision dosing (MIPD)multi‐label classificationpopulation pharmacokineticstherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)vancomycinXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40734640
PMCPMC12521055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.