ArticleAngiology2026
A Comparison of Carotid Ultrasound and Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography in Assessing Plaque Morphology in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.
Article in Angiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atherosclerosis is a predominant cause of cardiovascular events and the accurate assessment of plaque morphology is crucial for risk stratification and treatment planning. Carotid ultrasound (CUS) and coronary artery optical coherence tomography (OCT) are valuable imaging modalities for evaluating atherosclerotic plaques. This study aimed to compare the reliability of CUS and OCT in assessing plaque morphology and atherosclerosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Forty-six patients with chronic coronary syndrome underwent OCT to evaluate coronary plaques and CUS to assess carotid plaques. The findings showed that both imaging techniques detected the presence of plaques, with OCT providing more detailed information on coronary plaque morphology compared with CUS. OCT and CUS measurements demonstrated significant correlations in lumen stenosis, plaque sizes, and representations of calcified plaques. Furthermore, distinct differences were observed in plaque distribution and characteristics between the coronary and carotid arteries. Certain cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, arterial hypertension, and obesity were associated with specific plaque properties identified by OCT. This study underscores the complementary roles of OCT and CUS in assessing atherosclerosis and plaque vulnerability in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, providing valuable insights for clinical management and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.