ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Advancing Binding Affinity Calculations: A Non-Equilibrium Simulations Approach for Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energies in Systems with Trapped Waters.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Relative Binding Free Energy Calculation with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo, Water-swap Monte Carlo, Terminal-flip Monte Carlo and Replica Exchange Solute Tempering.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- A Quadrupolar Fullerene Model System for Benchmarking Enhanced Sampling of Trapped Waters in Free Energy Calculations.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The formation of protein-ligand complexes involves displacement of water molecules that were previously occupying the protein's binding site. In some cases, however, some water molecules may not be displaced by the ligand's binding, and they can stabilize the complex by mediating the interactions between the ligand and the protein. A relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculation between two ligands, one of which binds to the protein with an intermediate water while the other displaces the water, can yield wrong results if the water fails to rearrange itself within the simulation timescale. Enhanced sampling methods have previously been used to address the sampling of such "trapped" waters, inserting or deleting waters in the protein's binding site during ligand transformation. While sometimes effective, the enhanced sampling methods typically require long simulation times to converge and may lead to differences in RBFE estimates (i.e., hysteresis) based on initial water placement. In this study, we present a non-equilibrium switching (NES) method to calculate RBFEs in systems with trapped waters. Our approach requires the knowledge of the positions of the trapped waters prior to performing the free energy calculation for ligand transformation and then uses this information to efficiently calculate the RBFE between the ligands. In our simulation protocol, we perform ligand transformation in the binding site of the target protein by using three consecutive NES switches. The three NES switches implement restraints, transform the ligand, and then remove the restraints. We demonstrate that our NES simulation-based method results in RBFE estimates within 1.1 kcal mol
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.