ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Learning Curves in Prospective Life Cycle Assessment.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering of Optoelectronic Devices for Renewable Energy Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Evaluating the binder performance and biocomposite applications of thermally reactivated wood-wool cement panel waste.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Projecting environmental improvements in mineral processing pathways: the case of cathode active material production.The international journal of life cycle assessment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental learning curves have great potential to predict future changes in environmental footprints of technologies as part of prospective life cycle assessments. However, concrete guidance is currently missing on how to integrate environmental learning curves into prospective life cycle assessments. Here, we propose a method to combine (i) process-specific environmental learning curves for key technology parameters and (ii) projections from integrated assessment models to include relevant changes in background processes, such as expected decarbonization of the electricity grid. Our method enables process contribution analyses, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, and flexibility in the assessment of various impact categories. Application of our proposed method is demonstrated in a case study assessing various environmental footprints of producing monocrystalline silicon photovoltaic panels. We showed that environmental footprints reduce 21-80% between 2020 and 2050 through a synergy of (i) and (ii). Footprint reductions were mostly driven by background changes when decarbonization is extensive, whereas process-specific environmental learning curves become the major driver for footprint reductions when developments in background processes follow a similar trajectory as charted by the past. Our method may also be used in the assessment of emerging technologies by applying process-specific environmental learning curves to mature parts of their supply chain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.