ArticleTrends in hearing
Cochlear Tuning in Early Aging Estimated with Three Methods.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On the Sharpness of Auditory Filters: Considering Subclinical Deficits Reveals Sharper Otoacoustic Emission Estimates of Frequency Selectivity in Humans.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) currently affects over 20 million adults in the U.S. and its prevalence is expected to increase as the population ages. However, little is known about the earliest manifestations of ARHL, including its influence on auditory function beyond the threshold of sensation. This work explores the effects of early aging on frequency selectivity (i.e., "tuning"), a critical feature of normal hearing function. Tuning is estimated using both behavioral and physiological measures-fast psychophysical tuning curves (fPTC), distortion product otoacoustic emission level ratio functions (DPOAE LRFs), and stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE) phase gradient delay. All three measures were selected because they have high potential for clinical translation but have not been compared directly in the same sample of ears. Results indicate that there may be subtle changes in tuning during early aging, even in ears with clinically normal audiometric thresholds. Additionally, there are notable differences in tuning estimates derived from the three measures. Psychophysical tuning estimates are highly variable and statistically significantly different from OAE-derived tuning estimates, suggesting that behavioral tuning is uniquely influenced by factors not affecting OAE-based tuning. Across all measures, there is considerable individual variability that warrants future investigation. Collectively, this work suggests that age-related auditory decline begins in relatively young ears (<60 years) and in the absence of traditionally defined "hearing loss." These findings suggest the potential benefit of characterizing ARHL beyond threshold and establishing a gold standard for measuring frequency selectivity in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.