ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Experiences of having an eating disorder and perceptions of its etiology: A qualitative study to inform genetic counseling practice.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences of having an eating disorder and perceptions of its etiology: A qualitative study to inform genetic counseling practice.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been limited research regarding how people with eating disorders (EDs) perceive the causes of these conditions. We conducted an interpretive description study to explore the perceived causes of EDs among individuals with a history of EDs, and to examine how healthcare professionals (HCPs) can provide better care for people with these conditions. We interviewed 15 diverse individuals, with emphasis on gender and racial diversity, with a history of EDs about their perceived etiologies of their EDs, what they wished the public and HCPs knew about EDs, and their thoughts on a 3-min video explaining the multifactorial etiology of EDs. After "line-by-line" coding, themes were used to inductively develop a model to describe individuals' experiences of EDs. Participants' narrative about their experiences of their EDs focused on the condition arising from multiple identity- and environment-related causes, which contributed to a negative cycle of emotions that led to feelings of isolation. Perceptions of the cause of EDs and access to treatment were influenced by systemic issues (e.g., racism, sexism), lack of knowledge about, and stigma associated with EDs. Participants wanted personalized care that acknowledges the factors they perceive to contribute to their ED. Our findings support previous work-showing that the causes of EDs are perceived to be complex, and that shame, stigma, guilt, and self-denial are barriers to treatment. It is important for HCPs to provide holistic, empathic care for people with EDs and acknowledge the systemic issues that affect EDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.