Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734178›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Perspectives of user groups in the co-creation of a targeted dental care service intervention for older adults receiving home healthcare: an explorative study.

Ragnhild Hellesø, Silje Havrevold Henni, Lubomiła Korzeniewska, Vibeke Elise Ansteinsson, Ewa Alicja Szyszko Hovden, Marte-Mari Uhlen-Strand, Berit Arnesveen Bronken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ragnhild HellesøDepartment of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. ragnhild.helleso@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7757-6521
Silje Havrevold HenniDepartment of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9309-8726
Lubomiła KorzeniewskaOral Health Centre of Expertise in Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Vibeke Elise AnsteinssonDepartment of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-6687
Ewa Alicja Szyszko HovdenOral Health Centre of Expertise in Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1346-6881
Marte-Mari Uhlen-StrandOral Health Centre of Expertise in Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-7619
Berit Arnesveen BronkenDepartment of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, University of Inland Norway, Elverum, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7954-4814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of older adults receive home healthcare in their homes, some of whom lose their capacity and ability to take care of their own health, including oral health. Poor oral health may have serious consequences that can lead to poor nutrition, diseases, isolation, and even death. There is an urgent need to involve users in developing targeted interventions to ensure that eligible older adults exercise their right to receive appropriate dental care. The purpose of the study was to explore what user groups emphasised in co-creating a targeted dental care intervention for older adults receiving home healthcare.

methodsIn this study, an exploratory design with an inductive and interpretive approach was employed. In two six-hour workshops, eleven participants representing three older adults, one next of kin, two nurses, and five dental care providers exchanged and discussed their perspectives on dental care as part of a co-creation process. Data were collected from group and plenary discussions during the workshops and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe different user groups conveyed confusing and contradictory understandings and interpretations of the dental healthcare landscape. This uncertainty resulted in missed information regarding dental care, leading to situations where they do not always seek dental healthcare services until an acute issue arises. A blurred perception of older adults' needs for support, combined with shortcomings in collaboration, communication, and the exchange of digital information systems, has led to a lack of knowledge about one another and inadequate dental healthcare for this vulnerable group. The various user groups suggested different solutions; however, several key issues emerged as urgent to address. There is a need to build and integrate systems into home healthcare's digital administrative and health record systems to support the clarification and identification of eligible patients, as well as to develop a digital coordination and communication system to connect the two levels of service.

conclusionsUnpacking the perspectives of the different user groups uncovered that an intervention must take into account the views of all groups. Understanding and incorporating the perceptions of all the different user groups were crucial for developing an intervention that enables a preventive and collaborative dental care approach.

Indexed as

Dental Care for AgedHome Care ServicesAgedFemaleHumansMaleOral HealthQualitative ResearchCo-creationComplex interventionDental care serviceOlder adultsQualitativeQuality of home healthcareUser involvement

Identifiers

PMID40734178
PMCPMC12309005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.