Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40733750›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

100-Day Mission for Future Pandemic Vaccines, Viewed Through the Lens of Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs).

Yodira Guadalupe Hernandez-Ruiz, Erika Zoe Lopatynsky-Reyes, Rolando Ulloa-Gutierrez, María L Avila-Agüero, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales, Jessabelle E Basa, Frederic W Nikiema, Enrique Chacon-Cruz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yodira Guadalupe Hernandez-RuizEscuela de Medicina, Universidad de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León 66238, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-664X
Erika Zoe Lopatynsky-ReyesThink Vaccines LLC., Houston, TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-6521
Rolando Ulloa-GutierrezServicio de Aislamiento Pediatría, Hospital Nacional de Niños "Dr. Carlos Sáenz Herrera", San José 1654-1000, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-9157-9227
María L Avila-AgüeroServicio de Infectología, Hospital Nacional de Niños "Dr. Carlos Sáenz Herrera", San José 10905, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-1979-0431
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15307, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-2192
Jessabelle E BasaResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City 2428, Metro Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-4716-9159
Frederic W NikiemaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale de l'Ouest, 399 Avenue de la Liberté, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Hauts-Bassins 0P1 BP 545, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-6226-9230
Enrique Chacon-CruzThink Vaccines LLC., Houston, TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2466-4920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 100-Day Mission, coordinated by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and endorsed by significant international stakeholders, aims to shorten the timeframe for developing and implementing vaccines to 100 days after the report of a new pathogen. This ambitious goal is outlined as an essential first step in improving pandemic preparedness worldwide. This review highlights the mission's implementation potential and challenges by examining it through the lens of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which often face barriers to equitable vaccine access. This article explores the scientific, economic, political, and social aspects that could influence the mission's success, relying on lessons learned from previous pandemics, such as the Spanish flu, H1N1, and COVID-19. We also examined important cornerstones like prototype vaccine libraries, accelerated clinical trial preparedness, early biomarkers identification, scalable manufacturing capabilities, and rapid pathogen characterization. The review also explores the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement and the significance of Phase 4 surveillance in ensuring vaccine safety. We additionally evaluate societal issues that disproportionately impact LMICs, like vaccine reluctance, health literacy gaps, and digital access limitations. Without intentional attempts to incorporate under-resourced regions into global preparedness frameworks, we argue that the 100-Day Mission carries the risk of exacerbating already-existing disparities. Ultimately, our analysis emphasizes that success will not only rely on a scientific innovation but also on sustained international collaboration, transparent governance, and equitable funding that prioritizes inclusion from the beginning.

Indexed as

100-day planCEPIpandemicvaccines

Identifiers

PMID40733750
PMCPMC12300188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.