Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40733717›Full record

ArticleVaccines2025

Challenges and Lessons Learned from a Field Trial on the Understanding of the Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex.

Elisa Crisci, Andrew R Kick, Lizette M Cortes, John J Byrne, Amanda F Amaral, Kim Love, Hao Tong, Jianqiang Zhang, Phillip C Gauger, Jeremy S Pittman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elisa CrisciDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-8508
Andrew R KickDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4414-763X
Lizette M CortesDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-3909
John J ByrneDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1533-7047
Amanda F AmaralDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.
Kim LoveK. R. Love Quantitative Consulting and Collaboration, Athens, GA 30608, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5912-9525
Hao TongDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2019-1337
Jianqiang ZhangDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-6202
Phillip C GaugerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-8769
Jeremy S PittmanSmithfield Foods, Smithfield, VA 23430, USA.
Tobias KäserDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-7971

Funding

North Carolina Pork Council 19M105MF1.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) is a multifaceted, polymicrobial syndrome resulting from a combination of environmental stressors, primary infections (e.g., PRRSV) and secondary infectious agents (viruses and bacteria). PRDC causes severe lung pathology, leading to reduced performance, increased mortality rates, and higher production costs in the global pig industry. Our goal was to conduct a comprehensive study correlating both the anti-PRRSV immune response and 21 secondary infectious agents with PRDC severity.

methodsTo this end, PRRSV-negative weaners were vaccinated with a PRRSV-2 MLV and put into a farm with a history of PRDC. Subsequently, anti-PRRSV cellular and antibody responses were monitored pre-vaccination, at 28 days post vaccination (dpv) and during PRDC outbreak (49 dpv). NanoString was used to quantify 21 pathogens within the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at the time of necropsy (51 dpv). PRRSV-2 was present in 53 out of 55 pigs, and the other five pathogens (PCMV, PPIV,

resultsAlthough the uncontrolled settings of field trials complicated data interpretation, multivariate correlation analyses highlighted valuable lessons: (i) high weaning weight predicted animal resilience to disease and high weight gains correlated with the control of the PRRSV-2 field strain; (ii) most pigs cleared MLV strain within 7 weeks, and the field PRRSV-2 strain was the most prevalent lung pathogen during PRDC; (iii) all pigs developed a systemic PRRSV IgG antibody response which correlated with IgG and IgA levels in BAL; (iv) the induction of anti-field strain-neutralizing antibodies by MLV PRRSV-2 vaccination was both late and limited; (v) cellular immune responses were variable but included strong systemic IFN-γ production against the PRRSV-2 field strain; (vi) the most detected lung pathogens correlated with PRRSV-2 viremia or lung loads; (vii) within the six detected pathogens, two viruses, PRRSV-2 and PCMV, significantly correlated with the severity of the clinical outcome.

conclusionsWhile a simple and conclusive answer to the multifaceted nature of PRDC remains elusive, the key lessons derived from this unique study provide a valuable framework for future research on porcine respiratory diseases.

Indexed as

immunityNanoStringPRDCPRRSV-2

Identifiers

PMID40733717
PMCPMC12299284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.