Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40733704›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Advances in Oncolytic Viral Therapy in Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review.

Ayushi Garg, Rohit Rao, Felicia Tejawinata, Gazi Amena Noor Shamita, McKay S Herpel, Akihiro Yoshida, Gordon Goolamier, Jessica Sidiropoulos, Iris Y Sheng, Salim-Tamuz Abboud and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ayushi GargWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Rohit RaoCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Felicia TejawinataCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Gazi Amena Noor ShamitaCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6565-869X
McKay S HerpelUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-4190-015X
Akihiro YoshidaCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9785-9035
Gordon GoolamierUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Jessica SidiropoulosUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Iris Y ShengCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Salim-Tamuz AbboudUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Luke D RothermelCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Nami AzarUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Ankit ManglaCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6789-4315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy revolutionized the treatment of patients with melanoma. However, in patients where melanoma exhibits resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the treatment options are limited. Oncolytic viruses are a unique form of immunotherapy that uses live viruses to infect and lyse tumor cells to release the elusive neoantigen picked up by the antigen-presenting cells, thus increasing the chances of an immune response against cancer. Coupled with checkpoint inhibitors, intratumoral injections of the oncolytic virus can help an enhanced immune response, especially in a tumor that displays resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. However, oncolytic viruses are not bereft of challenges and face several obstacles in the tumor microenvironment. From the historical use of wild viruses to the sophisticated use of genetically modified viruses in the current era, oncolytic virus therapy has evolved tremendously in the last two decades. Increasing the ability of the virus to select the malignant cells over the non-malignant ones, circumventing the antiviral immune response from the body, and enhancing the oncolytic properties of the viral platform by attaching various ligands are some of the several improvements made in the last three decades. In this manuscript, we trace the journey of the development of oncolytic virus therapy, especially in the context of melanoma. We review the clinical trials of talimogene laherparepvec in patients with melanoma. We also review the data available from the clinical trials of vusolimogene oderparepvec in patients with melanoma. Finally, we review the use of various oncolytic viruses and their challenges in clinical development. This manuscript aims to create a comprehensive literature review for clinicians to understand and implement oncolytic virus therapy in patients diagnosed with melanoma.

Indexed as

adenovirusHerpes Simplex Virushistory of oncolytic virusesimmunotherapymelanomaoncolytic virusesRP-1talimogene laherparepvecT-VECvaccinia virusvusolimogene oderparepvec

Identifiers

PMID40733704
PMCPMC12298472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.