ArticlePolymers2025
Impact of Temperature, pH, Electrolytes, Approach Speed, and Contact Area on the Coalescence Time of Bubbles in Aqueous Solutions with Methyl Isobutyl Carbinol.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevention of bubble coalescence is essential in various industrial processes, such as mineral flotation, where the stability of air-liquid interfaces significantly affects performance. The combined influence of multiple physicochemical parameters on bubble coalescence remains insufficiently understood, particularly under conditions relevant to flotation. This study explores the key factors that influence the inhibition of bubble coalescence in aqueous solutions containing methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), providing a systematic comparative analysis to assess the effect of each variable on coalescence inhibition. An experimental method was employed in which two air bubbles were formed from identical capillaries and brought into contact either head-to-head or side-by-side, then held until coalescence occurred. This setup allows for reliable measurements of coalescence time with minimal variability regarding the conditions under which the bubbles interact. The study examined the effects of several factors: temperature, pH, salt concentration and type, bubble approach speed, contact area, and contact configuration. The results reveal that coalescence is delayed at lower temperatures, alkaline pH conditions, high salt concentrations, and larger interfacial contact areas between bubbles. Within the range studied, the influence of approach speed was found to be insignificant. These findings provide valuable insights into the fundamental mechanisms governing bubble coalescence and offer practical guidance for optimizing industrial processes that rely on the controlled stabilization of air-liquid interfaces. By understanding and manipulating the factors that inhibit coalescence, it is possible to design more efficient and sustainable mineral flotation systems, thereby reducing environmental impact and conserving water resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.