ArticlePolymers2025
A Novel Parametrical Approach to the Ribbed Element Slicing Process in Robotic Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermal Deformation in Non-Planar Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of ABS: Experimental and Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing is one of the most common technologies used in prototyping and manufacturing usable parts. Currently, industrial robots are also increasingly being used to carry out this process. This is due to a robot's capability to fabricate components with structural configurations that are unattainable using conventional 3D printers. The number of degrees of freedom of the robot, combined with its working range and precision, allows the construction of parts with greater dimensions and better strength in comparison to conventional 3D printing. However, the implementation of a robot into the 3D printing process requires the development of novel solutions to streamline and facilitate the prototyping and manufacturing processes. This work focuses on the need to develop new slicing methods for robotic additive manufacturing. A solution for alternative control code generation without external slicer utilization is presented. The implementation of the proposed method enables a reduction of over 80% in the time required to generate new G-code, significantly outperforming traditional approaches. The paper presents a novel approach to the slicing process in robotic additive manufacturing that is adopted for the fused granular fabrication process using thermoplastic polymers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.