Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732817›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Structural Properties, Mechanical Behavior, and Food Protecting Ability of Chickpea Protein-Derived Biopolymer Films.

Mehmet Şükrü Karakuş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mehmet Şükrü KarakuşApplication and Research Center for Science and Technology, Harran University, Sanliurfa 63300, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-8206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to enhance the characteristic properties of chickpea proteins enriched with quercetin by incorporating whey proteins. For this, whey proteins were supplemented into the film systems at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% of the total protein content, and these formulations were labeled as CWF1, CWF2, CWF3, CWF4, and CWF5, in that order. Negative control (CF) was designed with chickpea protein alone. Essential amino acid content of chickpea protein (16.48%) was higher than that of whey protein (8.09%). FTIR spectra revealed protein-protein interactions occurred within film systems. Raising the whey protein content above 40% led to morphological issues in the films. Differences in moisture content, thickness, color, and opacity were obvious (

Indexed as

chickpea proteinfood packagingFTIR spectrafunctionalized edible filmmechanical behavior

Identifiers

PMID40732817
PMCPMC12298727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.