ArticlePolymers2025
Development of a Mathematical Model for Predicting the Average Molten Zone Thickness of HDPE Pipes During Butt Fusion Welding.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the determination of the molten zone thickness in HDPE pipes during butt fusion welding primarily depends on experimental and numerical methods, leading to high costs and reduced efficiency. In this study, a mathematical (MM) model based on Neumann's solution for the melting of a semi-infinite region was developed to efficiently predict the average molten zone (AMZ) thickness of HDPE pipes under varying heating temperatures and heating times while incorporating the effects of heat convection. Additionally, a two-dimensional CFD model was constructed using finite element analysis (FEA) to validate the MM model. Welding pressure was not considered in this study. The effects of heating temperature, heating time, and heat convection on the AMZ thickness in HDPE pipes were systematically analyzed. The heating temperature at the heated end of HDPE ranged from 190 °C to 350 °C in 20 °C increments, with a temperature of 28 °C as the ambient and initial setting, and the heating time was set to 180 s for both the MM and CFD models. The results demonstrate a strong correlation between the AMZ thickness predictions from the MM and CFD models. The relative error between the MM and CFD models ranges from 0.280% to 10,830% with heat convection and from -2.398% to 8.992% without heat convection. Additionally, for the MM model, the relative error between cases with and without heat convection ranges from 0.243% to 0.433%, whereas for the CFD model, it varies between 1.751% and 3.189%. These findings confirm the reliability of the MM model developed in this study and indicate that thermal convection has a minimal impact on AMZ thickness prediction for large-diameter, thick-walled HDPE pipes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.