ArticlePolymers2025
Error Modeling and Error Control Study of PA/Pine Wood Biomass Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser sintering (LS) technology is one of the most widely commercialized additive manufacturing technologies. However, the popularization of LS technology in civilian applications has long been constrained by accuracy-related issues. Polyamide (PA), as the most mature LS material, still faces challenges in controlling part dimensional errors. Biomass materials, when used as fillers, can improve the printing accuracy of fabricated parts, demonstrating a technically feasible synergy between PA and biomass materials. Therefore, this study analyzes the fundamental material properties of PA/pine biomass composites and investigates error control methods for LS-fabricated parts using PA/biomass materials as feedstock. This study investigates the error modeling of LS-fabricated parts from two perspectives. First, a theoretical mathematical model is established to predict part errors by incorporating material properties, process parameters, and equipment factors. Second, a data-driven model is developed using BP neural network technology based on experimental data to correlate LS process parameters with part dimensional errors. Additionally, the predictive capabilities and compensation effects of both models are examined. The experimental results indicate that the nylon/pine wood biomass composite with a pine wood content of 3 wt% can produce molded parts with a tensile strength of 20 MPa. Additionally, this material exhibits a sintering preheating window range of 10 °C, which facilitates the production of parts with both favorable mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy. Both error prediction models are capable of predicting the dimensional deviations of the parts. The data-driven model demonstrates superior deviation prediction accuracy (approximately 81-91%) for LS parts compared to the theoretical mathematical model (approximately 62-73%). By applying compensation based on the error prediction models, the overall dimensional deviation can be reduced from 1.61-3.49% to 0.41-0.50%. Consequently, the part's precision grade (according to ISO 2768) is improved from below Grade V to Grade C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.