Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732604›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Experimental Analysis on the Effect of Contact Pressure and Activity Level as Influencing Factors in PPG Sensor Performance.

Francesco Scardulla, Gloria Cosoli, Cosmina Gnoffo, Luca Antognoli, Francesco Bongiorno, Gianluca Diana, Lorenzo Scalise, Leonardo D'Acquisto, Marco Arnesano

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco ScardullaDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Gloria CosoliDepartment of Theorethical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, v. Isimbardi 10, 22060 Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-208X
Cosmina GnoffoDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Luca AntognoliDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, v. Brecce Bianche 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5435-8516
Francesco BongiornoDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-442X
Gianluca DianaDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-5303-5408
Lorenzo ScaliseDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, v. Brecce Bianche 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4728-3736
Leonardo D'AcquistoDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4837-1797
Marco ArnesanoDepartment of Theorethical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, v. Isimbardi 10, 22060 Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-3075

Funding

Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research PON R&I ARSO1_00345Italian Ministry of Research Prot. 2022RKLB3J
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensors are small and cheap wearable sensors which open the possibility of monitoring physiological parameters such as heart rate during normal daily routines, ultimately providing valuable information on health status. Despite their potential and distribution within wearable devices, their accuracy is affected by several influencing parameters, such as contact pressure and physical activity. In this study, the effect of contact pressure (i.e., at 20, 60, and 75 mmHg) and intensity of physical activity (i.e., at 3, 6, and 8 km/h) were evaluated on a sample of 25 subjects using both a reference device (i.e., an electrocardiography-based device) and a PPG sensor applied to the skin with controlled contact pressure values. Results showed differing accuracy and precision when measuring the heart rate at different pressure levels, achieving the best performance at a contact pressure of 60 mmHg, with a mean absolute percentage error of between 3.36% and 6.83% depending on the physical activity levels, and a Pearson's correlation coefficient of between 0.81 and 0.95. Plus, considering the individual optimal contact pressure, measurement uncertainty significantly decreases at any contact pressure, for instance, decreasing from 15 bpm (at 60 mmHg) to 8 bpm when running at a speed of 6 km/h (coverage factor k = 2). These results may constitute useful information for both users and manufacturers to improve the metrological performance of PPG sensors and expand their use in a clinical context.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyWearable Electronic DevicesAdultExerciseFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicYoung Adultactivity levelcontact forcecontact pressureheart rateinfluencing parametersmeasurement accuracyphotoplethysmographyPPGPPG sensorwearables

Identifiers

PMID40732604
PMCPMC12300268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.