ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Masked Feature Residual Coding for Neural Video Compression.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parameter Adaptive Network for Large-Scale Neural In-Loop Filtering in Versatile Video Coding.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring Learned Surveillance Video Coding with Long-Term Reference and Adaptive Long-Short Modeling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In neural video compression, an approximation of the target frame is predicted, and a mask is subsequently applied to it. Then, the masked predicted frame is subtracted from the target frame and fed into the encoder along with the conditional information. However, this structure has two limitations. First, in the pixel domain, even if the mask is perfectly predicted, the residuals cannot be significantly reduced. Second, reconstructed features with abundant temporal context information cannot be used as references for compressing the next frame. To address these problems, we propose Conditional Masked Feature Residual (CMFR) Coding. We extract features from the target frame and the predicted features using neural networks. Then, we predict the mask and subtract the masked predicted features from the target features. Thereafter, the difference is fed into the encoder with the conditional information. Moreover, to more effectively remove conditional information from the target frame, we introduce a Scaled Feature Fusion (SFF) module. In addition, we introduce a Motion Refiner to enhance the quality of the decoded optical flow. Experimental results show that our model achieves an 11.76% bit saving over the model without the proposed methods, averaged over all HEVC test sequences, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.