ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pixel 5 Versus Pixel 9 Pro XL-Are Android Devices Evolving Towards Better GNSS Performance?
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental Context Indicator for Evaluating Quality of GNSS Observation Environment Using Android Smartphone.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smartphone GNSS technology has advanced significantly, but its performance varies considerably among Android devices due to differences in hardware and software. This study compares the GNSS capabilities of the Google Pixel 5 and Pixel 9 Pro XL (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) using five-hour static measurements under three environmental conditions: open area, canopy, and indoor. Complete raw GNSS data and the tools used for positioning are freely available. The analysis focuses on signal quality and positioning accuracy, derived using raw GNSS measurements. Results show that the Pixel 9 Pro XL provides better signal completeness, a higher carrier-to-noise density (C/N0), and improved L5 frequency reception. However, this enhanced signal quality does not always translate to superior positioning accuracy. In single-point positioning (SPP), the Pixel 5 outperformed the Pixel 9 Pro XL in open conditions when considering mean positional errors, while the Pixel 9 Pro XL performed better under canopy conditions. The precise point positioning results are modest compared to the current state of the art, only achieving accuracies of a few meters. The static method achieved sub-decimeter accuracy for both devices in optimal conditions, with Pixel 9 Pro XL demonstrating a higher fix rate. Findings highlight ongoing challenges in smartphone GNSS, particularly related to the limited quality of signals received by smartphone GNSS receivers. While newer devices show improved signal reception, precise positioning remains limited. Future research should explore software enhancements and the use of various external correction sources to optimize GNSS accuracy for mobile users. Generally, a shift from research to user-ready applications is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.