ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Kinesiological Analysis Using Inertial Sensor Systems: Methodological Framework and Clinical Applications in Pathological Gait.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency Clinical Decision for Sports Injury Management: A Wearable Sensor-Driven Framework from Training to Rehabilitation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Real-time approach to evaluate spinal cord topography of motor pool activation during gait.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate gait assessment is essential for managing pathological locomotion, especially in elderly patients recovering from hip joint surgeries. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide real-time, objective data in clinical settings. This study examined pelvic oscillations in sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes using a wearable IMU system in two groups: Group A (n = 15, osteosynthesis metallica) and Group B (n = 34, arthroplasty), all over age 65. Gait analysis was conducted during assisted and unassisted walking. In the frontal plane, both groups showed statistically significant improvements: Group A from 46.4% to 75.2% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.