ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Preliminary Quantitative Evaluation of the Optimal Colour System for the Assessment of Peripheral Circulation from Applied Pressure Using Machine Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral circulatory failure refers to a condition in which the blood flow through superficial capillaries is markedly reduced or completely occluded. In clinical practice, nurses strictly adhere to regular repositioning protocols to prevent peripheral circulatory failure, during which the skin condition is evaluated visually. In this study, skin colour changes resulting from pressure application were continuously captured using a camera, and supervised machine learning was employed to classify the data into two categories: before and after pressure. The evaluation of practical colour space components revealed that the h component of the JCh colour space demonstrated the highest discriminative performance (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.88), followed by the a* component of the CIELAB colour space (AUC = 0.84) and the H component of the HSV colour space (AUC = 0.83). These findings demonstrate that it is feasible to quantitatively evaluate skin colour changes associated with pressure, suggesting that this approach can serve as a valuable indicator for dimensionality reduction in feature extraction for machine learning and is potentially an effective method for preventing pressure-induced skin injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.