Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732566›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

An Inexpensive AI-Powered IoT Sensor for Continuous Farm-to-Factory Milk Quality Monitoring.

Kaneez Fizza, Abhik Banerjee, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Ali Yavari, Anas Dawod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaneez FizzaDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-6935
Abhik BanerjeeDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4660-4507
Dimitrios GeorgakopoulosDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-2140
Prem Prakash JayaramanDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-3443
Ali YavariDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0588-5931
Anas DawodDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of protein and fat in raw milk determines its quality, value in the marketplace, and related payment to suppliers. Technicians use expensive specialized laboratory equipment to measure milk quality in specialized laboratories. The continuous quality monitoring of the milk supply in the supplier's tanks enables the production of higher quality products, better milk supply chain optimization, and reduced milk waste. This paper presents an inexpensive AI-powered IoT sensor that continuously measures the protein and fat in the raw milk in the tanks of dairy farms, pickup trucks, and intermediate storage depots across any milk supply chain. The proposed sensor consists of an in-tank IoT device and related software components that run on any IoT platform. The in-tank IoT device quality incorporates a low-cost spectrometer and a microcontroller that can send milk supply measurements to any IoT platform via NB-IoT. The in-tank IoT device of the milk quality sensor is housed in a food-safe polypropylene container that allows its deployment in any milk tank. The IoT software component of the milk quality sensors uses a specialized machine learning (ML) algorithm to translate the spectrometry measurements into milk fat and protein measurements. The paper presents the design of an in-tank IoT sensor and the corresponding IoT software translation of the spectrometry measurements to protein and fat measurements. Moreover, it includes an experimental milk quality sensor evaluation that shows that sensor accuracy is ±0.14% for fat and ±0.07% for protein.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiosensing TechniquesMilkAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleDairyingFarmsMachine LearningSoftwarein-tank milk monitoringInternet of ThingsIoT sensor

Identifiers

PMID40732566
PMCPMC12299062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.