ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lightweight Dual-Attention Network for Concrete Crack Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced Blood Cell Detection in YOLOv11n Using Gradient Accumulation and Loss Reweighting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural health monitoring in resource-constrained environments demands crack segmentation models that match the accuracy of heavyweight convolutional networks while conforming to the power, memory, and latency limits of watt-level edge devices. This study presents a lightweight dual-attention network, which is a four-stage U-Net compressed to one-quarter of the channel depth and augmented-exclusively at the deepest layer-with a compact dual-attention block that couples channel excitation with spatial self-attention. The added mechanism increases computation by only 19%, limits the weight budget to 7.4 MB, and remains fully compatible with post-training INT8 quantization. On a pixel-labelled concrete crack benchmark, the proposed network achieves an intersection over union of 0.827 and an F1 score of 0.905, thus outperforming CrackTree, Hybrid 2020, MobileNetV3, and ESPNetv2. While refined weight initialization and Dice-augmented loss provide slight improvements, ablation experiments show that the dual-attention module is the main factor influencing accuracy. With 110 frames per second on a 10 W Jetson Nano and 220 frames per second on a 5 W Coral TPU achieved without observable accuracy loss, hardware-in-the-loop tests validate real-time viability. Thus, the proposed network offers cutting-edge crack segmentation at the kiloflop scale, thus facilitating ongoing, on-device civil infrastructure inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.