Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732548›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Wearable Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: Performance and Interpretability of Dynamic Neural Networks.

Dalius Navakauskas, Martynas Dumpis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Explainable and Subject-Independent VOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dalius NavakauskasDepartment of Electronic Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Plytines g. 25-234, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-8897-7366
Martynas DumpisDepartment of Electronic Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Plytines g. 25-234, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0003-4335-372X

Funding

New Generation Lithuania / Ministry of the Economy and Innovation of the Republic of Lithuania 02-002-P-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensor data is increasingly important in healthcare, rehabilitation, and smart monitoring. This study systematically compared three dynamic neural network architectures-Finite Impulse Response Neural Network (FIRNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU)-to examine their suitability and specificity for HAR tasks. A controlled experimental setup was applied, training 16,500 models across different delay lengths and hidden neuron counts. The investigation focused on classification accuracy, computational cost, and model interpretability. LSTM achieved the highest classification accuracy (98.76%), followed by GRU (97.33%) and FIRNN (95.74%), with FIRNN offering the lowest computational complexity. To improve model transparency, Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) was applied to both input and hidden layers. The results showed that gyroscope Y-axis data was consistently the most informative, while accelerometer Y-axis data was the least informative. LRP analysis also revealed that GRU distributed relevance more broadly across hidden units, while FIRNN relied more on a small subset. These findings highlight trade-offs between performance, complexity, and interpretability and provide practical guidance for applying explainable neural wearable sensor-based HAR.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesNeural Networks, ComputerWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsBiosensing TechniquesHumansdynamic neural networksfinite impulse response neural networkGRUhuman activity recognitionlayer-wise relevance propagationLSTMwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40732548
PMCPMC12299264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.