ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Wind Turbine Blade Defect Recognition Method Based on Large-Vision-Model Transfer Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Sensor Consistency-Guided Dual-Spectrum Fusion for Offshore Wind Turbine Blade Defect Diagnosis and Risk Grading.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely and accurate detection of wind turbine blade surface defects is crucial for ensuring operational safety and improving maintenance efficiency with respect to large-scale wind farms. However, existing methods often suffer from poor generalization, background interference, and inadequate real-time performance. To overcome these limitations, we developed an end-to-end defect recognition framework, structured as a three-stage process: blade localization using YOLOv5, robust feature extraction via the large vision model DINOv2, and defect classification using a Stochastic Configuration Network (SCN). Unlike conventional CNN-based approaches, the use of DINOv2 significantly improves the capability for representation under complex textures. The experimental results reveal that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.8% and an average inference time of 19.65 ms per image, satisfying real-time requirements. Compared to traditional methods, this framework provides a more scalable, accurate, and efficient solution for the intelligent inspection and maintenance of wind turbine blades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.