ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Measurement of Fracture Networks in Rock Sample by X-Ray Tomography, Convolutional Filtering and Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive methodology for the detection and characterization of fractures in geological samples using X-ray computed tomography (CT). By combining convolution-based image processing techniques with advanced neural network-based segmentation, the proposed approach achieves high precision in identifying complex fracture networks. The method was applied to a marly limestone sample from the Maiolica Formation, part of the Umbria-Marche stratigraphic succession (Northern Apennines, Italy), a geological context where fractures often vary in size and contrast and are frequently filled with minerals such as calcite or clays, making their detection challenging. A critical part of the work involved addressing multiple sources of uncertainty that can impact fracture identification and measurement. These included the inherent spatial resolution limit of the CT system (voxel size of 70.69 μm), low contrast between fractures and the surrounding matrix, artifacts introduced by the tomographic reconstruction process (specifically the Radon transform), and noise from both the imaging system and environmental factors. To mitigate these challenges, we employed a series of preprocessing steps such as Gaussian and median filtering to enhance image quality and reduce noise, scanning from multiple angles to improve data redundancy, and intensity normalization to compensate for shading artifacts. The neural network segmentation demonstrated superior capability in distinguishing fractures filled with various materials from the host rock, overcoming the limitations observed in traditional convolution-based methods. Overall, this integrated workflow significantly improves the reliability and accuracy of fracture quantification in CT data, providing a robust and reproducible framework for the analysis of discontinuities in heterogeneous and complex geological materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.