ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Bridge Crack Segmentation Algorithm Based on Fuzzy C-Means Clustering and Feature Fusion.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CLGDS: robust bridge crack detection with YOLO enhanced feature fusion and SIoU optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- YOLO11-FR: A bridge crack detection method based on frequency-domain fusion and an edge enhancement mechanism.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the limitations of traditional image processing algorithms, such as high noise sensitivity and threshold dependency in bridge crack detection, and the extensive labeled data requirements of deep learning methods, this study proposes a novel crack segmentation algorithm based on fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering and multi-feature fusion. A three-dimensional feature space is constructed using B-channel pixels and fuzzy clustering with c = 3, justified by the distinct distribution patterns of these three regions in the image, enabling effective preliminary segmentation. To enhance accuracy, connected domain labeling combined with a circularity threshold is introduced to differentiate linear cracks from granular noise. Furthermore, a 5 × 5 neighborhood search strategy, based on crack pixel amplitude, is designed to restore the continuity of fragmented cracks. Experimental results on the Concrete Crack and SDNET2018 datasets demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves an accuracy of 0.885 and a recall rate of 0.891, outperforming DeepLabv3+ by 4.2%. Notably, with a processing time of only 0.8 s per image, the algorithm balances high accuracy with real-time efficiency, effectively addressing challenges, such as missed fine cracks and misjudged broken cracks in noisy environments by integrating geometric features and pixel distribution characteristics. This study provides an efficient unsupervised solution for bridge damage detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.