ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Determination of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Using a Smartphone's IMU in the Pocket: Threshold-Based and Deep Learning Approaches.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Walking with a Passive Hip Exoskeleton and Wearables: Gait Characteristics and Metabolic Power in Senior Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Trial
- A Digital Cueing Intervention for Parkinsonian Gait: Laboratory-Based Clinical Validation and Acute Gait Responses.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Recognition of Gait Alterations Induced by Alcohol-Impairment Simulation Goggles Using Smartphone Accelerometer Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable Sensors Reveal Head-Sternum Dissociation as a Latent Deficit in Active Aging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of Brainstem Volume Changes in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): A Study on Patients and Preclinical Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a hybrid approach combining threshold-based algorithm and deep learning to detect four major gait events-initial contact (IC), toe-off (TO), opposite initial contact (OIC), and opposite toe-off (OTO)-using only a smartphone's built-in inertial sensor placed in the user's pocket. The algorithm enables estimation of spatiotemporal gait parameters such as cadence, stride length, loading response (LR), pre-swing (PSw), single limb support (SLS), double limb support (DLS), and swing phase and symmetry. Gait data were collected from 20 healthy individuals and 13 hemiparetic stroke patients. To reduce sensitivity to sensor orientation and suppress noise, sum vector magnitude (SVM) features were extracted and filtered using a second-order Butterworth low-pass filter at 3 Hz. A deep learning model was further compressed using knowledge distillation, reducing model size by 96% while preserving accuracy. The proposed method achieved error rates in event detection below 2% of the gait cycle for healthy gait and a maximum of 4.4% for patient gait in event detection, with corresponding parameter estimation errors also within 4%. These results demonstrated the feasibility of accurate and real-time gait monitoring using a smartphone. In addition, statistical analysis of gait parameters such as symmetry and DLS revealed significant differences between the normal and patient groups. While this study is not intended to provide or guide rehabilitation treatment, it offers a practical means to regularly monitor patients' gait status and observe gait recovery trends over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.