Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732510›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Using Large Languge Models for Processing Sensor Data.

Maciej Hojda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maciej HojdaFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3195-4862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wide availability of sensor data stored in multiple formats makes it difficult to reuse in other applications. We consider the problem of extracting sensor data from unstructured and semi-structured texts using Large Language Models. With careful prompt crafting, we have been able to establish a strict JSON structure which can be further processed with automated ease. We establish a workflow that enables the extraction of data using GPT-4, Llama 3, Mistral and Falcon models, and we show that while the closed-source GPT-4 model is generally leading in conversion efficiency, other open-source models can follow this if given appropriate data structures. We define new measures to simplify the comparison, and we present a multi-purpose workflow for sensor data extraction. We observe that some of the smaller models are incapable of correctly extracting data from freeform text but are skilled in processing tabular data. On the other hand, larger models are more robust and avoid conversion mistakes more easily.

Indexed as

data extractiondata reusabilityLarge Language Modelssensors

Identifiers

PMID40732510
PMCPMC12299101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.