ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Remote Sensing Extraction of Damaged Buildings in the Shigatse Earthquake, 2025: A Hybrid YOLO-E and SAM2 Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In January 2025, a magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck Dingri County, Shigatse, Tibet, causing severe damage. Rapid and precise extraction of damaged buildings is essential for emergency relief and rebuilding efforts. This study proposes an approach integrating YOLO-E (Real-Time Seeing Anything) and the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) to extract damaged buildings with multi-source remote sensing images, including post-earthquake Gaofen-7 imagery (0.80 m), Beijing-3 imagery (0.30 m), and pre-earthquake Google satellite imagery (0.15 m), over the affected region. In this hybrid approach, YOLO-E functions as the preliminary segmentation module for initial segmentation. It leverages its real-time detection and segmentation capability to locate potential damaged building regions and generate coarse segmentation masks rapidly. Subsequently, SAM2 follows as a refinement step, incorporating shapefile information from pre-disaster sources to apply precise, pixel-level segmentation. The dataset used for training contained labeled examples of damaged buildings, and the model optimization was carried out using stochastic gradient descent (SGD), with cross-entropy and mean squared error as the selected loss functions. Upon evaluation, the model reached a precision of 0.840, a recall of 0.855, an F1-score of 0.847, and an IoU of 0.735. It successfully extracted 492 suspected damaged building patches within a radius of 20 km from the earthquake epicenter, clearly showing the distribution characteristics of damaged buildings concentrated in the earthquake fault zone. In summary, this hybrid YOLO-E and SAM2 approach, leveraging multi-source remote sensing imagery, delivers precise and rapid extraction of damaged buildings with a precision of 0.840, recall of 0.855, and IoU of 0.735, effectively supporting targeted earthquake rescue and post-disaster reconstruction efforts in the Dingri County fault zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.