ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Novel Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Fusion of Fundus and Optical Coherence Tomography Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deriving OCT-Equivalent Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps from Fundus Photographs with Deep Learning Improves Glaucoma Diagnosis.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- A Lightweight Vision Transformer and Retinal Biomarker Fusion Framework for Early Glaucoma Detection: Toward Improved Clinical Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- MultiRetNet: A Lightweight Explainable AI Approach to Diabetic Retinopathy Grading and DME Detection Using Fundus-OCT Fusion.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- A Functional Shape Framework for the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Using Optical Coherence Tomography Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated Report Generation in Ophthalmology: Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Imaging, and Clinical Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- An extensive analysis of machine learning techniques for identifying glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, yet early detection can prevent vision loss. This paper proposes a novel deep learning approach that combines two ophthalmic imaging modalities, fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography scans, as paired images from the same eye of each patient for automated glaucoma detection. We develop separate convolutional neural network models for fundus and optical coherence tomography images and a fusion model that integrates features from both modalities for each eye. The models are trained and evaluated on a private clinical dataset (Bangladesh Eye Hospital and Institute Ltd.) consisting of 216 healthy eye images (108 fundus, 108 optical coherence tomography) from 108 patients and 200 glaucomatous eye images (100 fundus, 100 optical coherence tomography) from 100 patients. Our methodology includes image preprocessing pipelines for each modality, custom convolutional neural network/ResNet-based architectures for single-modality analysis, and a two-branch fusion network combining fundus and optical coherence tomography feature representations. We report the performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve) of the fundus-only, optical coherence tomography-only, and fusion models. In addition to a fixed test set evaluation, we perform five-fold cross-validation, confirming the robustness and consistency of the fusion model across multiple data partitions. On our fixed test set, the fundus-only model achieves 86% accuracy (AUC 0.89) and the optical coherence tomography-only model, 84% accuracy (AUC 0.87). Our fused model reaches 92% accuracy (AUC 0.95), an absolute improvement of 6 percentage points and 8 percentage points over the fundus and OCT baselines, respectively. McNemar's test on pooled five-fold validation predictions (b = 3, c = 18) yields χ2=10.7 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.