Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732464›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Novel Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Fusion of Fundus and Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Saad Islam, Ravinesh C Deo, Prabal Datta Barua, Jeffrey Soar, U Rajendra Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saad IslamArtificial Intelligence Applications Laboratory, School of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-8307
Ravinesh C DeoArtificial Intelligence Applications Laboratory, School of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2290-6749
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5117-8333
Jeffrey SoarSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4964-7556
U Rajendra AcharyaArtificial Intelligence Applications Laboratory, School of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-8552

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND USQ PHD STIPEND AND FEE SCHOLARSHIP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, yet early detection can prevent vision loss. This paper proposes a novel deep learning approach that combines two ophthalmic imaging modalities, fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography scans, as paired images from the same eye of each patient for automated glaucoma detection. We develop separate convolutional neural network models for fundus and optical coherence tomography images and a fusion model that integrates features from both modalities for each eye. The models are trained and evaluated on a private clinical dataset (Bangladesh Eye Hospital and Institute Ltd.) consisting of 216 healthy eye images (108 fundus, 108 optical coherence tomography) from 108 patients and 200 glaucomatous eye images (100 fundus, 100 optical coherence tomography) from 100 patients. Our methodology includes image preprocessing pipelines for each modality, custom convolutional neural network/ResNet-based architectures for single-modality analysis, and a two-branch fusion network combining fundus and optical coherence tomography feature representations. We report the performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve) of the fundus-only, optical coherence tomography-only, and fusion models. In addition to a fixed test set evaluation, we perform five-fold cross-validation, confirming the robustness and consistency of the fusion model across multiple data partitions. On our fixed test set, the fundus-only model achieves 86% accuracy (AUC 0.89) and the optical coherence tomography-only model, 84% accuracy (AUC 0.87). Our fused model reaches 92% accuracy (AUC 0.95), an absolute improvement of 6 percentage points and 8 percentage points over the fundus and OCT baselines, respectively. McNemar's test on pooled five-fold validation predictions (b = 3, c = 18) yields χ2=10.7 (

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaTomography, Optical CoherenceFundus OculiHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligenceautomated detectiondeep learningfundusfusionglaucomaOCT

Identifiers

PMID40732464
PMCPMC12300660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.