ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Complex Environmental Geomagnetic Matching-Assisted Navigation Algorithm Based on Improved Extreme Learning Machine.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In complex environments where satellite signals may be interfered with, it is difficult to achieve precise positioning of high-speed aerial vehicles solely through the inertial navigation system. To overcome this challenge, this paper proposes an NGO-ELM geomagnetic matching-assisted navigation algorithm, in which the Northern Goshawk Optimization (NGO) algorithm is used to optimize the initial weights and biases of the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM). To enhance the matching performance of the NGO-ELM algorithm, three improvements are proposed to the NGO algorithm. The effectiveness of these improvements is validated using the CEC2005 benchmark function suite. Additionally, the IGRF-13 model is utilized to generate a geomagnetic matching dataset, followed by comparative testing of five geomagnetic matching models: INGO-ELM, NGO-ELM, ELM, INGO-XGBoost, and INGO-BP. The simulation results show that after the airborne equipment acquires the geomagnetic data, it only takes 0.27 µs to obtain the latitude, longitude, and altitude of the aerial vehicle through the INGO-ELM model. After unit conversion, the average absolute errors are approximately 6.38 m, 6.43 m, and 0.0137 m, respectively, which significantly outperform the results of four other models. Furthermore, when noise is introduced into the test set inputs, the positioning error of the INGO-ELM model remains within the same order of magnitude as those before the noise was added, indicating that the model exhibits excellent robustness. It has been verified that the geomagnetic matching-assisted navigation algorithm proposed in this paper can achieve real-time, accurate, and stable positioning, even in the presence of observational errors from the magnetic sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.