ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
ROS-Based Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance: A Study of Architectures, Methods, and Trends.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of the Robot Operating System (ROS), technologies for autonomous navigation in mobile robots have advanced considerably. ROS provides a modular navigation stack that integrates essential components, such as SLAM, localisation, global path planning, and obstacle avoidance, forming the foundation for applications including service robotics and autonomous driving. Nonetheless, achieving safe and reliable navigation in complex and dynamic environments remains a formidable challenge, due to the need for real-time perception of moving obstacles, sensor fusion requirements, and the demand for robust and efficient algorithms. This study presents a systematic examination of the ROS-based navigation stack and obstacle-avoidance mechanisms. The architecture and implementation principles of the core modules are analysed, along with a comparison of the features and application suitability of common local planners such as the Dynamic Window Approach (DWA) and Timed Elastic Band (TEB). The key technical challenges in autonomous navigation are summarised, and recent advancements are reviewed to outline emerging trends in ROS-based systems, including integration with deep learning, multi-robot coordination, and real-time optimisation. The findings contribute to a deeper theoretical understanding of robotic navigation and offer practical guidance for the design and development of autonomous systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.