Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732430›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Towards Improved Eye Movement Biometrics: Investigating New Features with Neural Networks.

Katarzyna Harezlak, Ewa Pluciennik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna HarezlakDepartment of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-9772
Ewa PluciennikDepartment of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2977-6262

Funding

Free of Charge Invitation Invitation to Publish a Feature Paper in Special Issue "New Trends in Biometric Sensing and Information Processing" - Free of Charge
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing protected access to many everyday-used resources is becoming increasingly necessary. Research on applying eye movement for this purpose has been conducted for many years. However, due to technological advancements and the lack of stable solutions, subsequent explorations remain valid. The presented work is one of such studies. Two methods of biometric identification based on eye movements that utilize neural networks have been developed. In the first case, a feature vector was constructed from a 100-element time series depicting eye movement dynamics, which included velocity, acceleration, jerk, their point-to-point percentage changes, and frequency-domain representations. The same eye movement dynamic features were used in the second method, but this time, statistical values were calculated based on the previously defined time series. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and dense networks were used in the user identification task in the first and second approaches, respectively. In the exploration, the publicly available GazeBase dataset was used, from which data collected for the 'jumping point' stimulus were chosen. The obtained results are very promising, with an accuracy of 96% for the LSTM model and the time series feature vector set and 76% for the second method. They were achieved over a three-year time span of eye movement recordings; however, different time periods were investigated, as well as various numbers of stimulus positions.

Indexed as

BiometryEye MovementsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansbiometricsclassificationeye movementfeature selectionLSTMneural network

Identifiers

PMID40732430
PMCPMC12300204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.