ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards Improved Eye Movement Biometrics: Investigating New Features with Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Providing protected access to many everyday-used resources is becoming increasingly necessary. Research on applying eye movement for this purpose has been conducted for many years. However, due to technological advancements and the lack of stable solutions, subsequent explorations remain valid. The presented work is one of such studies. Two methods of biometric identification based on eye movements that utilize neural networks have been developed. In the first case, a feature vector was constructed from a 100-element time series depicting eye movement dynamics, which included velocity, acceleration, jerk, their point-to-point percentage changes, and frequency-domain representations. The same eye movement dynamic features were used in the second method, but this time, statistical values were calculated based on the previously defined time series. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and dense networks were used in the user identification task in the first and second approaches, respectively. In the exploration, the publicly available GazeBase dataset was used, from which data collected for the 'jumping point' stimulus were chosen. The obtained results are very promising, with an accuracy of 96% for the LSTM model and the time series feature vector set and 76% for the second method. They were achieved over a three-year time span of eye movement recordings; however, different time periods were investigated, as well as various numbers of stimulus positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.