ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dynamic Path Planning for Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles Based on CAS-UNet and Graph Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a deeply integrated model called CAS-GNN, aiming to solve the collaborative path-planning problem for multi-agent vehicles operating in dynamic environments. Our proposed model integrates CAS-UNet and Graph Neural Network (GNN), and, by introducing a dynamic edge enhancement module and a dynamic edge weight update module, it improves the accuracy of obstacle boundary recognition in complex scenarios and adaptively changes the influence of different edges during the information transmission process. We generate data through online trajectory optimization to enhance the model's adaptability to dynamic environments. Simulation results show that our proposed CAS-GNN model has good performance in path planning. In a dynamic scenario involving six vehicles, our model achieved a success rate of 92.8%, a collision rate of 0.0836%, and a trajectory efficiency of 64%. Compared with the traditional A-GNN model, our proposed CAS-GNN model improves the planning success rate by 2.7% and the trajectory efficiency by 8%, while reducing the collision rate by 23%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.