ReviewMicroorganisms2025
Endophytic Bioactive Compounds for Wound Healing: A Review of Biological Activities and Therapeutic Potential.
Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Unlocking the hidden potential of the genus Salvia through a systematic review of endophytic bacterial and fungal diversity and biotechnological prospects.Archives of microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Endophytic Fungi Natural Factories of Novel Bioactive Compounds.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Pooled it
- Endophytic Fungi as a Promising Source of Bioactive Compounds for Wound Healing: A Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endophytic microorganisms inhabiting plant tissues constitute a unique and largely untapped reservoir of bioactive metabolites, including phenolics, terpenoids, alkaloids, polysaccharides, and anthraquinones, among others. This review focuses on the potential of these compounds to modulate the complex processes of wound repair, such as hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Uniquely, this review delineates the specific mechanisms supported not only by indirect evidence but by primary research directly linking endophytic metabolites to wound repair. We synthesized and evaluated evidence from 18 studies, of which over 75% directly assessed wound healing effects through in vitro and in vivo models. Metabolites from endophytic microorganisms promoted wound contraction, suppressed biofilm formation by key pathogens (e.g., MRSA, P. aeruginosa), and accelerated tissue re-epithelialization in animal models. Other compounds demonstrated >99% wound closure in rats, while several extracts showed anti-inflammatory and cytocompatible profiles. Nevertheless, the majority of studies applied unstandardized methods and used crude extracts, hindering precise structure-activity assessment. The originality of this review lies in drawing attention to direct evidence for wound healing from diverse endophytic sources and systematically identifying gaps between preclinical promise and clinical translation, positioning endophytes as a sustainable platform for next-generation wound therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.