ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Application of Real-Time PCR Syndromic Panel on Lower Respiratory Tract Samples: Potential Use for Antimicrobial De-Escalation.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular methods allow for a rapid identification of the main causative agents of pneumonia along with the most frequent resistance genes. Prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy without microbiological evidence of infection drives antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated if the result provided by the molecular method is helpful for antimicrobial de-escalation. All respiratory samples collected and directly processed via Real-Time PCR from patients with suspected pneumonia, of whom clinical data were available, were included in this study. In 82 patients out of a total of 174 (47.1%), antimicrobial therapy was modified after the molecular test, and in 28/82 (34.1%), antimicrobial de-escalation was carried out. Among the 92 patients in whom therapy was not modified, 33 (35.9%) were did not receive any antimicrobial therapy before the molecular test and no antibiotics were prescribed after the test. Therefore, in 61 (28 + 33) out of the 174 (35%) patients, unnecessary antimicrobials were discontinued or avoided. The syndromic panel used at our institution can be of help in better choosing when empiric antibiotic de-escalation therapy could be feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.