ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Five-Year Analysis of Microbial Keratitis Incidence, Isolates, and In Vitro Antimicrobial Sensitivity in the South West of England: An Epidemiological Study.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status on antimicrobial resistance in keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Rapid Pathogen Detection in Severe Infectious Keratitis: Prospective Evaluation of Combined Multiplex PCR Panels Versus Standard Microbiology.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- In Vivo Confocal Microscopy and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Optimizing Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management in Fungal Keratitis: Case Reports and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the incidence, causative organisms, and treatment effectiveness for microbial keratitis (MK) in the Southwest of England. Retrospective analysis of 872 corneal scrapes (January 2018-December 2022). Microbiology results were evaluated for organism growth and antimicrobial sensitivity. Data were divided into two groups for trend analysis (A: 2018-2020, B: 2021-2022). Of the 872 scrapes, 357 (39.6%) were culture positive. Bacteria accounted for 90.2% of cases, followed by viruses (2.8%), fungi (2.5%), mixed bacterial growth (2.5%), and Acanthamoeba (2.0%). The estimated incidence of MK was 9.69/100,000/year. Group B had a significantly higher overall MK incidence, with no change in pathogen distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.