Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731813›Full record

Observational studyMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

The Manchester Procedure as a Uterine-Preserving Alternative for Uterine Prolapse Due to Cervical Elongation: A Short- and Mid-Term Clinical Analysis.

Claudia Liger Guerra, Lorena Sabonet Morente, Juan Manuel Hidalgo Fernandez, Manuel Navarro Romero, Cristina Espada Gonzalez, Jesus S Jimenez-Lopez

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Surgical treatment of apical prolapse Number 9 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia Liger GuerraDepartment of Surgical Specialties, University of Malaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Lorena Sabonet MorenteObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Materno-Infantil, Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga, Avenue Arroyo de los Ángeles S/N, 29011 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6577-0557
Juan Manuel Hidalgo FernandezObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Materno-Infantil, Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga, Avenue Arroyo de los Ángeles S/N, 29011 Málaga, Spain.
Manuel Navarro RomeroObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Materno-Infantil, Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga, Avenue Arroyo de los Ángeles S/N, 29011 Málaga, Spain.
Cristina Espada GonzalezObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Materno-Infantil, Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga, Avenue Arroyo de los Ángeles S/N, 29011 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2436-9326
Jesus S Jimenez-LopezDepartment of Surgical Specialties, University of Malaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-8656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriGynecologic Surgical ProceduresUterine ProlapseAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSpainTreatment OutcomeUteruscervical elongationManchester procedurepatient satisfactionpelvic organ prolapsesurgical outcomesurogynecologyuterine preservation

Identifiers

PMID40731813
PMCPMC12301056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.