ArticleMicromachines2025
Optimization Design of the Two-Stage Reduction Micro-Drive Mechanism Based on Particle Swarm Algorithm.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving high-precision positioning operations in a small space was of great significance in aerospace, biomedical, and other fields. In order to obtain smaller displacements with higher accuracy, this paper focused on the design, optimization, and performance analysis of a two-stage reduction micro-drive mechanism. Using the principle of lever and the principle of balanced additional force, a two-stage reduction micro-motion mechanism without parasitic motion and non-motion directional force was designed, and the structure optimization of the mechanism was completed by employing the particle swarm algorithm. A finite element analysis was conducted to assess the strength, dynamics, and kinematic properties of the mechanism. Experimental methods were also employed to analyze its dynamic and kinematic properties. The analysis results demonstrated that the mechanism met the design requirements in terms of strength and dynamic properties, with a maximum error of 9.02% and a maximum kinematic error of 0.0267 μm. The achieved reduction ratio was 24.73:1. These results indicated that the mechanism possesses excellent strength and dynamic performance, a large reduction ratio, high motion accuracy, and good linearity. This paper contributes significantly to the advancement of research in precision mechanical motion and micro-drive mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.