ArticleMicromachines2025
A Hierarchical Inverse Lithography Method Considering the Optimization and Manufacturability Limit by Gradient Descent.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inverse lithography technology (ILT) based on the gradient descent (GD) algorithm, which is a classical local optimal method, can effectively improve the lithographic imaging fidelity. However, due to the low-pass filtering effect of the lithography imaging system, GD, although able to converge quickly, is prone to fall into the local optimum for the information in the corner region of complex patterns. Considering the high-frequency information of the corner region during the optimization process, this paper proposes a resolution layering method to improve the efficiency of GD-based ILT algorithms. A corner-rounding-inspired target retargeting strategy is used to compensate for the over-optimization defect of GD for inversely optimizing the complex pattern layout. Furthermore, for ensuring the manufacturability of masks, differentiable top-hat and bottom-hat operations are employed to improve the optimization efficiency of the proposed method. To confirm the superiority of the proposed method, multiple optimization methods of ILT were compared. Numerical experiments show that the proposed method has higher optimization efficiency and effectively avoids the over-optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.