ArticleMicromachines2025
3D-Printed Multi-Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels: Fabrication and Characterization.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Wu et al. 3D-Printed Multi-Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels: Fabrication and Characterization.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stimulus-responsive hydrogels have broad applications in the biomedical, sensing, and actuation fields. However, conventional fabrication methods are often limited to 2D structures, hindering the creation of complex, personalized 3D hydrogel architectures. Furthermore, hydrogels responding to only a single stimulus and delays in fabrication techniques restrict their practical utility in biomedicine. In this study, we developed two novel multi-stimuli-responsive hydrogels (based on Gelatin/Sodium Alginate and Tannic Acid/EDTA-FeNa complexes) specifically designed for direct ink writing (DIW) 3D printing. We systematically characterized the printed properties and optimized component ratio, revealing sufficient mechanical strength (e.g., tensile modulus: Gel/SA-TA ≥ 0.22854 ± 0.021 MPa and Gel/SA-TA@Fe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.