ArticleMicromachines2025
Structural Optimization Design of the Dual-Layer CMUT with Low Power Consumption and High Ultrasonic Reception Performance.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian-Optimized Collapse-Mode CMUT with Trenched Membrane for High Output Pressure.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers in Medical Imaging.Micromachines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) have been widely applied in fields such as air-coupled ultrasonic nondestructive testing, gesture recognition, and 3D imaging. However, most current CMUTs struggle to simultaneously achieve both low power consumption and high performance, which limits their application in relevant fields. In this paper, a dual-layer CMUT is proposed, and its structural optimization design is also analyzed. The dual-layer CMUT consists of a top-layer circular CMUT cell and a bottom-layer annular CMUT cell. A movable pillar connects the top and bottom cells of the double-layer CMUT. This design increases the total deflection and reduces the stiffness, making the membrane more susceptible to deformation under external forces, thereby achieving low power consumption and high reception performance. The finite element method (FEM) results showed that, compared with conventional CMUTs, the structural optimization design of the dual-layer CMUT had a 13.7% reduction in collapse voltage. The improvements in the maximum deflection, average deflection, electromechanical coupling coefficient, transmitting sensitivity, and receiving sensitivity were 41.2%, 68.0%, 84.6%, 17.7%, and 101.6%, respectively. Therefore, the dual-layer CMUT has low power consumption and high reception performance while maintaining transmission performance, and it has potential for applications in portable, low-power devices and air-coupled ultrasonic nondestructive testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.