ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Potential Use of Wastewater Treatment Plant Washed Mineral Waste as Flood Embankment Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recycling washed mineral waste, generated as a byproduct of the mechanical wastewater treatment process, can be a beneficial alternative to widely used natural sand in construction. Studies on material from the Warsaw agglomeration, available in quantities sufficient for construction applications, demonstrated its high usability in specific hydrotechnical applications. Key laboratory tests for material characterization included physical, permeability, mechanical, and chemical property analyses. The tested waste corresponds to uniformly graded medium sands (uniformity coefficient: 2.20) and weakly calcareous (calcium carbonate content: 2.25-3.29%) mineral soils with organic content ranging from 0.24% to 1.49%. The minimum heavy metal immobilization level reached 91.45%. At maximum dry density of the soil skeleton (1.78/1.79 g/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.