ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring the 3D Printability of Engineered Cementitious Composites with Internal Curing for Resilient Construction in Arid Regions.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Cementitious Materials: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility of pumice-based internal curing based on the 3D printability of engineered cementitious composites (ECCs) for water-scarce environments and arid regions. Natural river sand was partially replaced with the presoaked pumice lightweight aggregates (LWAs) at two different levels, 30% and 60% by volume, and 50% of the cement was replaced with slag to enhance sustainability. Furthermore, 2% polyethylene (PE) fibers were used to improve the mechanical characteristics and 1% methylcellulose (MC) was used to increase the rheological stability. Pumice aggregates, presoaked for 24 h, were used as an internal curing agent to assess their effect on the printability. Three ECC mixes, CT-PE2-6-10 (control), P30-PE2-6-10 (30% pumice), and P60-PE2-6-10 (60% pumice), were printed using a 3D gantry printing system. A flow table and rheometer were used to evaluate the flowability and rheological properties. Extrudability was measured in terms of dimensional consistency and the coefficient of variation (CV%) to evaluate printability, whereas buildability was determined in terms of the maximum number of layers stacked before failure. All of the mixes met the extrudability criterion (CV < 5%), with P30-PE2-6-10 demonstrating superior printing quality and buildability, having 16 layers, which was comparable with the control mix that had 18 layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.