Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731505›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Critical Review of Membrane Distillation Using Ceramic Membranes: Advances, Opportunities and Challenges.

Francesca Alessandro, Francesca Macedonio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesca AlessandroInstitute on Membrane Technology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITM), via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende, CS, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7605-2718
Francesca MacedonioInstitute on Membrane Technology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITM), via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende, CS, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8243-3963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane distillation (MD) has attracted increasing attention as a thermally driven separation process for water purification, desalination, and wastewater treatment. Its primary advantages include high rejection of non-volatile solutes, compatibility with low-grade or waste heat sources, and operation at ambient pressure. Despite these benefits, large-scale implementation remains limited due to the lack of membrane materials capable of withstanding harsh operating conditions and maintaining their hydrophobic character. Polymeric membranes have traditionally been used in MD applications; however, their limited thermal and chemical stability compromises long-term performance and reliability. In contrast, ceramic membranes are emerging as a promising alternative, offering superior mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and thermal stability. Nevertheless, their broader adoption in MD is hindered by several challenges, including high thermal conductivity, surface wettability, high fabrication costs, and limited scalability. This review provides a critical assessment of current developments, key opportunities, and ongoing challenges associated with the use of ceramic membranes in MD. Particular emphasis is placed on advances in surface modification techniques and the emerging applications in advanced MD configurations.

Indexed as

ceramic membranesmembrane distillationsurface modification

Identifiers

PMID40731505
PMCPMC12299761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.