Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731487›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Time-Domain Impedance Analysis on Passivation Quality of 316L Stainless Steel with Portable-Probe-Measured Potential Step Transient.

Haobin Li, Bufan Jiang, Chi Cheng, Congqian Cheng, Qibo Wang, Tieshan Cao, Jie Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haobin LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Bufan JiangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Chi ChengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Congqian ChengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Qibo WangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Tieshan CaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Jie ZhaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve rapid detection of stainless steel passivation quality, a time-domain impedance method was investigated based on a potential step transient with a portable three-electrode probe. A comparison of the effects of signal analysis and transient parameters was conducted, and the results were compared with those obtained in a bulk solution with a general three-electrode system. The measured transient current with the probe offered a higher signal-to-noise ratio, with minimal deviation from the frequency-domain impedance observed at a step amplitude of 0-100 mV. Measurements using the three-electrode probe under different stabilization times indicated that, after 30 s of stabilization, the measurement deviation was less than 1%, enabling a rapid assessment. Comparative testing of surfaces with varying passivation quality revealed that the pitting potential increases with increasing time-domain impedance, demonstrating the method's capability to distinguish passivated surfaces with different corrosion resistances.

Indexed as

316L stainless steelpotential step methodquality of passivationthree-electrodetime-domain impedance

Identifiers

PMID40731487
PMCPMC12298384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.